This chapter interrogates the prevalent notion of AI autonomy through the lens of Theravāda Buddhist philosophy, particularly the doctrine of anattā (non-self) and the analytical framework of the pañcakkhandhā (five aggregates). It critiques the anthropomorphic portrayal of AI as independent, self-sustaining agents, arguing instead that both human beings and artificial systems are best understood as conditioned, processual constructs. By deconstructing the illusion of AI autonomy, the chapter exposes the ethical dangers of misattributed agency, including the deflection of human accountability and the fostering of misplaced trust. It advocates for a more philosophically coherent and ethically responsible approach to AI development, grounded in transparency, explicit responsibility, epistemic humility, and relational ethics. The Theravāda perspective, with its emphasis on cognitive interdependence and ethical intentionality, offers a powerful corrective to dominant technological narratives and complements broader Buddhist contributions to the field of AI ethics.
Released: 17 December 2025Author: CHHEM Kieth Rethy, MD, PhD (Edu), and PhD (His)
This article argues that for small states, survival in an era shaped by great power rivalry, war economy dynamics, and artificial intelligence depends on scientific…
Released: 30 November 2025Author: CHHEM Kieth Rethy, MD, PhD (Edu), and PhD (His)
The Khmer Path Beyond AI explores how a mistranslation of “artificial intelligence” in Cambodia opened a deeper conversation about the difference between intelligence and wisdom.…
Released: 31 October 2025Author: CHHEM Kieth Rethy, MD, PhD (Edu), and PhD (His)
This essay examines the Khmer ethical system of Gatilok as a culturally grounded framework for AI ethics. Unlike Western approaches that prioritize universal principles, Gatilok…
Released: 10 October 2025Author: CHHEM Kieth Rethy, MD, PhD (Edu), and PhD (His)
The essay explores how Buddhist philosophy can reshape the way we understand and design artificial intelligence. It argues that AI should not be seen as…
Released: 26 September 2025Author: CHHEM Kieth Rethy, MD, PhD (Edu), and PhD (His)
This paper explores the intersection of David Hume’s empiricism and Nāgārjuna’s Madhyamaka philosophy as a framework for rethinking artificial intelligence. Hume’s bundle theory of the…
Released: 14 September 2025Author: SAY Vithya Arthur, MA in Business Innovation (MBI) | ROS Sayumphu, MA in Security, Conflict and International Development, LLM in International Law
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is transforming healthcare, transportation, and communication. This article traces the evolution and categorization of AI, while exploring ethical concerns such as bias…