This reflective essay explores how technological change reshapes the meaning of sovereignty, particularly for small nations navigating the AI era. Drawing on a multidisciplinary career spanning medicine, history, diplomacy, and nuclear risk governance, the author examines the intellectual motivations behind designing two courses, The Philosophy of Drone Sovereignty and Machines of Conflict. The article argues that contemporary sovereignty is increasingly epistemic, grounded in a nation’s capacity to generate, interpret, and verify its own data, rather than defined solely by territorial control. Through classroom experiences and lessons from nuclear crisis management, including institutional responses to Fukushima, the essay highlights how technological systems intertwine with organizational competence, public trust, and ethical judgment. It concludes that mathematics and physics are not merely academic disciplines but strategic foundations of national resilience, shaping a state’s ability to manage risk, maintain autonomy, and govern complex socio-technical systems in an age of automation.
Released: 31 August 2026Author: Alda Waddel, PhD Candidate
This paper explores the macroeconomic “AI displacement trap,” arguing that simultaneous global automation destroys the primary engine of economic demand by eliminating human wage income.…
Released: 26 July 2026Author: SAIDNATTAR Ryanna, Ph.D. Candidate in Science and Technology Policy
This examines how small states can navigate digital sovereignty within an AI landscape dominated by major powers like the United States and China. Rather than…
Released: 28 February 2026Author: MAY Thu, PhD in Computer Engineering
This article examines how Buddhist ethical principles can inform the development and governance of artificial intelligence. It argues that while AI is transforming sectors such…
Released: 11 February 2026Author: LIM Sengkhoun, MD, MHPE, International FAIMER Fellow
Effective use of generative AI (GenAI) requires transitioning from a “single-tool mindset” to a deliberate system that aligns task purposes with specific model capabilities, operational…
Released: 5 February 2026Author: ALDA Waddell, PhD Student
This paper critiques dominant AI ethics frameworks that focus on machines rather than the social and cultural contexts in which they operate. It argues that…
Released: 17 January 2026Author: TANN Thangvansounary, LLB | HOUT Sreypich, LLB | SOM Hunchhengleang, LLB
This article examines the growing use of artificial intelligence in Cambodia and the urgent need to address ethical and privacy concerns that come with it.…