AIF Insights No. 28 (2026) | AI, Gettier, and the Illusion of Knowing
This article explores the epistemological challenges posed by generative AI by applying Edmund Gettier’s classic problem—where a belief is true purely by accident or based…
Details
This reflective essay explores how technological change reshapes the meaning of sovereignty, particularly for small nations navigating the AI era. Drawing on a multidisciplinary career spanning medicine, history, diplomacy, and nuclear risk governance, the author examines the intellectual motivations behind designing two courses, The Philosophy of Drone Sovereignty and Machines of Conflict. The article argues that contemporary sovereignty is increasingly epistemic, grounded in a nation’s capacity to generate, interpret, and verify its own data, rather than defined solely by territorial control. Through classroom experiences and lessons from nuclear crisis management, including institutional responses to Fukushima, the essay highlights how technological systems intertwine with organizational competence, public trust, and ethical judgment. It concludes that mathematics and physics are not merely academic disciplines but strategic foundations of national resilience, shaping a state’s ability to manage risk, maintain autonomy, and govern complex socio-technical systems in an age of automation.